Denver Post: "Without Resources, FDA Can't Protect Consumers"
Without resources, FDA can't protect consumers
By The Denver PostArticle Last Updated: 05/20/2008 08:25:17 PM MDT
The Food and Drug Administration has finally acknowledged that it needs more resources to protect consumers from tainted food and drugs.
Unfortunately, it took the deaths of 81 people, a browbeating by members of Congress and a report detailing the FDA's woeful inability to expand overseas inspections before top agency officials would ask for more money.
It was a puzzling situation and one that has to make you wonder whether the Bush administration was putting the bottom line ahead of the health and safety of the American public.
Last week, FDA Commissioner Andrew C. von Eschenbach finally wrote Congress to say the agency needs an extra $275 million to make sure that food, drugs and medical devices from overseas are safe. The Senate appropriations committee quickly approved the request.
Given the high-profile instances of tainted products in recent years, it has become abundantly clear that the FDA does not have the resources to adequately inspect rising numbers of imports.
Last year, there was a string of pet deaths from melamine-contaminated wheat gluten imported from China. This year, the deaths of 81 people have been linked to tainted batches of the blood-thinning drug Heparin, also imported from China.
A recent Government Accountability Office report said the FDA would need $70 million to do a proper job of inspecting foreign facilities. However, the agency now gets only $11 million for that task.
Over the last few months, there has been a growing bipartisan consensus over the need for the FDA to do a better job of ensuring the safety of imported food, medicines and medical products.
Last year, the agency was able to inspect just 30 of the more than 3,200 foreign drug companies. This year, it planned to do 50 such inspections.
The Bush administration had proposed increasing the FDA budget by $50.7 million. And while that would raise the agency budget to $1.77 billion, the increase was not going to be enough to even cover routine salary increases at the agency.
The $275 million approved by the Senate committee would be used this way: an additional $125 million for food safety, $100 million for medical product and drug safety, $40 million to modernize FDA's science and $10 million for upgraded laboratories and facilities.
Public advocates for consumer safety are praising the potential for additional resources.
Protecting consumers from contaminated products is a basic and important government function. It's clear that the FDA has not had the resources to keep up with the globalization of the industries that the agency is charged with regulating.
The proposed infusion will set the FDA on the right course, and we hope Congress approves the additional funding.
Recent News
- AP: Food Safety Worries Change Buying Habits
- Star Tribune: Editorial: Food Safety Demands a Fresh Approach
- Baltimore Sun: Bush Seeks $275 Million More for the FDA
- Denver Post: "Without Resources, FDA Can't Protect Consumers"
- Federal Times: "Lawmakers Worry FDA Bill Adds Too Much Work"
Did You Know?
- The FDA oversees 80 percent of the nation's food supply, but only recieves 20 percent of food safety funding?
- HACCP (Harzard Analysis and Critical Control Point) was originally developed for NASA to ensure the safety of food for consumption in space?
- The FDA's entire budget is actually less than the budget for the school system in Montgomory County, MD, where FDA resides?
- Some in Congress would impose "User Fees" on Food Companies as a way to increase FDA's budget. Such "fees" are really just new taxes on food and would undoubtedly be passed through to the consumer by way of higher food prices.
- Current customs law already requires the importers of finished, packaged products, seafood, and some bulk foods to include country of origin labeling on the package. Beginning in 2008, fresh fruits and vegetables imported into the U.S. will also need to display their country of origin.